4 minPolitics
Survey Finds Most Americans Distrust AI Leaders While Using Chatbots Daily
A new national survey shows 58% of Americans do not trust AI company leaders to act in society's best interests, even as 41% use AI chatbots every day. The findings carry political weight ahead of the midterms, with data center opposition cutting across party lines.
A majority of Americans say they do not trust the leaders of artificial intelligence companies to make decisions in society's best interests, even as a large share of them use AI tools every day, according to a national survey conducted this month by Outward Intelligence. The findings point to a widening gap between how people use the technology and how much faith they place in the institutions building it.
Just 39% of respondents said AI has a positive impact on society, compared with 44% who said its impact is negative. Only 15% said they are excited about AI's growth. Yet 58% said they do not trust AI company leaders to act in society's best interests, while 41% reported using AI chatbots daily. Among those who believe AI harms society, roughly half still use chatbots at least weekly.
That contradiction is not unique to AI. Americans have shown they will adopt social media while worrying about its effects on children, participate in sports betting while fearing addiction, and shop online while mourning the decline of local businesses. But AI may test the limits of that tolerance, because the technology is being developed by companies that are also asking for public trust in decisions that could reshape employment, education and the economy.
The political implications are already visible. About two-thirds of respondents said a candidate's position on AI could influence their vote in the upcoming midterms, though most acknowledged that other issues matter more. Roughly one in six said the issue could actually determine their vote. Neither party has established much credibility with independent voters: nearly two-thirds of independents said they do not trust either party to handle AI responsibly, trust both equally, or are unsure.
The debate becomes most concrete at the local level, where data centers are proposed. More than half of respondents said they would oppose construction of a large data center near where they live, and nearly four in ten said they would strongly oppose it. Their concerns are practical: electricity costs rank first, followed by water usage and environmental impact. America's ability to compete internationally, a central argument for expanding AI infrastructure, ranks much lower.
That gap between national priorities and neighborhood concerns carries electoral costs. When asked about candidates who strongly support building more data centers, 42% of voters said that position would make them less likely to vote for a candidate, compared with 27% who said it would make them more likely. Among independents, the margin is wider still, at 49% to 19%.
The survey suggests that promising innovation and economic growth does not answer questions about electricity bills and corporate accountability, and that expressing concern about the technology does not explain how to capture its benefits. AI companies are asking for an enormous amount of public faith while making infrastructure investments that will affect communities across the country. Americans, meanwhile, are weighing who benefits, who bears the costs, and who is accountable when things go wrong.
For Silicon Valley and Washington alike, the challenge is no longer whether Americans will use AI. They already have. The harder task is earning, and deserving, their trust.
6
