3 minPolitics
SEC cuts commission quorum to one member without public comment
The Securities and Exchange Commission quietly amended its quorum rule so a single remaining commissioner can act when the other is recused, a change critics say concentrates power and reduces investor information.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has quietly changed the rule that determines how many commissioners must be present to act on agency business, allowing a single remaining commissioner to constitute a quorum whenever the other sitting commissioner is disqualified from a matter. The amendment to Rule 200.41 took effect on September 30 and was made without public comment, with the agency describing it as internal housekeeping that does not substantially affect anyone's rights or obligations.
The change matters because of the agency's current makeup. The SEC was designed as a five-member body with no more than three commissioners from the president's party, a structure intended to prevent any single party or individual from steering the nation's capital markets alone. According to the commentary, the Commission now has no Democratic members, and with the departure of Commissioner Hester Peirce on October 2, it is down to two members. Under the amended rule, a recusal would be enough for one person to exercise the full authority of the Commission.
The author of the commentary, published on, argues that the rule change fits a broader pattern. The piece points to the agency's moves to rescind the Climate Disclosure rule, the Say on Pay requirement and the shareholder proposal rule known as 14a-8. It also cites plans to reduce financial reporting from quarterly to twice a year, a sweeping rewrite of Regulation S-K, which sets out what material information public companies must disclose, and a decision that clears the way for companies to move shareholder complaints into private arbitration, where there is no jury and no public record.
Critics say these steps reduce the information available to the market. The commentary contends that stock prices are only as accurate as the public information behind them, and that pension funds, endowments and asset managers responsible for the retirement savings of more than a hundred million Americans depend on complete disclosure to meet their fiduciary duties. As an example of the consequences of undisclosed risk, the piece cites Meta, whose shareholders now face a $17 billion settlement after years of disputes with Mark Zuckerberg over harmful content, which the author says investors had warned about.
The author also frames the stakes in terms of investor confidence, noting that foreign investors accept American valuations because they trust the completeness of U.S. disclosures and the stability of its rules, and warning that capital may move elsewhere if that trust erodes. The commentary calls on investors and lawmakers to fill the empty Commission seats, reverse the one-member quorum definition and restore previously required information to the market. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the position of Fortune.
7
