4 minPolitics
Federal Agents Raid Rep. Ilhan Omar's DC Home in Immigration Fraud Probe
Homeland Security agents searched Rep. Ilhan Omar's Washington residence with a judicial warrant, as a federal investigation into possible immigration fraud expands. Omar's allies call it political retaliation; supporters of the probe say the warrant shows probable cause.
Federal agents searched the Washington, D.C., home of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., as part of an investigation into possible immigration fraud, according to accounts of the raid. Agents from the Department of Homeland Security carried a judicial warrant signed by a federal magistrate judge, a detail that supporters of the investigation say undercuts claims that the search was an act of political retaliation.
The raid has thrust the Minnesota congresswoman back into the center of a legal and political storm weeks before the midterm elections. Fellow progressive lawmakers, including Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, have characterized the search as political revenge by President Trump. The White House and the Justice Department have not publicly detailed the evidence behind the warrant, and the affidavit supporting it remains sealed.
The existence of a warrant signed by a neutral magistrate is significant, legal analysts note. The Fourth Amendment bars judges from issuing a warrant without probable cause, meaning the issuing judge found reason to believe evidence of at least one federal crime was inside the home. U.S. Magistrate Judge Matthew Sharbaugh, the duty judge in the District of Columbia at the time of the raid, reportedly signed the warrant. His record, including a past donation to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign and clerkships with Judge Robert Wilkins, an Obama appointee, suggests he is not predisposed to favor the Trump administration, making accusations of a rubber-stamp warrant harder to sustain.
The investigation appears to focus on Omar's citizenship status. Omar has said she became a U.S. citizen at age 17 through derivative naturalization after her father obtained citizenship. But questions have been raised about whether her father's own citizenship was obtained lawfully and whether official records of it exist. Separately, the Library of Congress has said Omar's staff sought to change her birth year in public sources in 2019. Under the original birth date, Omar would have been 18 at the time of naturalization, which would have made her ineligible for derivative citizenship through her father.
The Constitution requires seven years of U.S. citizenship to serve in the House. If Omar obtained citizenship fraudulently, she would not have been eligible to hold her seat. Federal law provides a civil process for denaturalization in cases of fraud, and there is no statute of limitations for such proceedings. Members of Omar's family have reportedly received subpoenas, and agents have seized her phone as part of the probe.
Omar's allies have rallied to her defense, arguing that the timing of the raid so close to the election is designed to damage her politically. Supporters of the investigation counter that the warrant and the involvement of a magistrate judge appointed by a majority of Obama and Biden appointees demonstrate that the matter is serious and evidence-based. The congresswoman has not been charged with any crime, and the full scope of the investigation remains unclear while the affidavit stays sealed.
The case has also renewed attention on Capitol Hill about the House's own role. Some Republicans have called for a congressional investigation into Omar's eligibility, and a top House Republican has said she should be jailed or deported if citizenship fraud is proven. Any move to expel Omar would require a House vote, a step that has been taken only rarely in the chamber's history. For now, the legal proceedings and the political fight are unfolding in parallel, with the sealed warrant at the center of both.
5
